Fairpoint gets written approval to buy Verizon’s Maine linesMaine Public Utilities Commission on Friday, February 1, 2008, issued a written order approving FairPoints proposed acquisition of Verizons wireline business in Maine. The PUC had previously agreed to the deal and this latest move formalizes its ruling. It stated that it will reserve the right to re-visit its decision based on what the regulators in Vermont and New Hampshrie ultimately rule.In a joint release at the end of January, FairPoint Communications, Inc and Verizon said they expected transer of ownership of Verizon Communications’ 1.6 million landlines in Vermont, New Hampshire and Maine for $2.7 billion to be done by February 29.The Vermont Public Service Department and the staff of the New Hampshire Public Utilities Commission in January agreed to the deal with conditions, such as on a de facto reduction of the price and on reducing the level of dividends FairPoint will be allowed to pay its shareholders (for updates, www.vermontbiz.com). The Federal Communications Commission also gave its approval in January.The regulators in both Vermont and New Hampshire still need to approve the deals, which are negotiated and approved separately. Meanwhile, Maine regulators already have approved a deal similar to those in Vermont and New Hampshire. Mains PUC, however, said it cold revisit its decision based on the structure of deal in the other two states.In addition to the key financial conditions in the amended stipulation in Maine and the key conditions in the settlement agreement with the Vermont Department of Public Service, FairPoint committed to additional conditions in New Hampshire which address capital expenditures, network and service quality improvement plans, broadband expansion and assurances of financial viability. The financial viability of FairPoint has been a concern of regulators and opponents of the deal, including the IBEW union. FairPoint will have to borrow upwards of $2 billion.The Vermont and New Hampshire agreements mimic the plan previously approved in Maine, which includes a steep reduction in FairPoint’s shareholder dividend (35 percent, resulting in a $50 million per year savings) and what is a de facto reduction in the price of the sale by $235.5 million. The financial moves were considered important in ensuring that FairPoint would be financially able to consummate the deal and live up to other provisions in the agreement, including extension of DSL service and other service and reliability guarantees.The deal also includes penalties up to $12.5 million if goals are not met. The Vermont agreement states that FairPoint must invest at least $40 million each year for the first three years and starting in 2009 spend at least $35 million to reduce debt. The entire deal still needs final approval by the Vermont Public Service Board, and by the regulatory body in New Hampshire.FairPoint has also agreed to make broadband Internet access available to all of its customers in at least half its exchanges by 2010.Even if FairPoint ultimately gains approval, discrepancies in the final rulings among the three states would have to be dealt with by each state’s regulatory board.
By Dialogo March 12, 2012 On March 6, Anayibe Rojas Valderrama, known as “Sonia,” a member of the FARC guerrilla group, and two other Colombian citizens were found guilty of trafficking drugs to the United States, sources at a Washington, D.C., district court informed AFP. This is the first time that a defendant suspected of FARC membership has been found guilty in a U.S. court. The 12 jurors who heard the case at a court in the District of Colombia, the U.S. capital, unanimously found Sonia, Jose Antonio Celis (alias “Calvo” [Bald]), and Juan Diego Giraldo (alias “Flaco” [Thin]) guilty of conspiracy to import and sell cocaine in the United States, by way of what the prosecutor’s office described as a “Panamanian connection.” According to judicial sources, sentencing is expected to be on May 4. Sources close to the case indicated that the penalty “Sonia” could receive for the charges against her ranges between 10 and 30 years in prison. The case also included a fourth defendant, José Benito Cabrera Cuevas (alias “Fabián Ramírez”), the only one of the defendants not in the power of the U.S. authorities. Celis, who is not suspected of being a member of the FARC, was described by prosecutors as responsible for trafficking the drugs by way of Panama, and Giraldo, also not a member of the rebel group, was described as an intermediary between the drug traffickers and the cocaine producers. The prosecutor’s office characterized “Sonia” as one of the leaders of Front 14 of the Southern Bloc of the FARC, which it described as Colombia’s leading guerrilla group, and stated that the proceeds from the drug trafficking of which she was accused were used to buy merchandise for the guerrilla group. Prosecutors in a Washington, D.C. district court also described “Sonia” as the “administrator” of the drug-shipment operations of Front 14 of the Southern Bloc of the FARC.